People v. Dien
N.Y.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2022People v. Adorno N.Y. App. Div.
- 2019People v. Freire N.Y. App. Div.
- 2019People v. Johnson N.Y. App. Div.
- 2018People v. Giddens N.Y. App. Div.
- 2017People v. Rosario N.Y. App. Div.
- 2017People v. Lembhard N.Y. App. Div.
- 2017People v. Bursey N.Y. App. Div.
- 2016People v. Westwood (John) N.Y. App. Term.
- 2016People v. Westwood N.Y. App. Term
- 2014People v. Wingfield N.Y. App. Div.
Cites 2 cases
- People v. Ford
- People v. Rivera
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Dien, Appellant.
Attorneys
- APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
- Robert S. Dean and Philip L. Weinstein for appellant.
- Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Phyllis A. Monroe and Amyjane Rettew of counsel), for respondent.
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant’s sole argument on appeal is that a specific comment made by the prosecutor during summation violated his rights to a fair trial by an impartial jury and to equal protection under the law. At the time of the prosecutor’s statement, however, defendant made only a general objection, thus failing to preserve his argument for this Court’s review (see, People v Rivera, 73 NY2d 941, 942; People v Ford, 69 NY2d 775, 776).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.