People v. Dawkins
N.Y. App. Div.
N.Y. App. Div.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oral Dawkins, Appellant.
Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.