People v. Coleman
N.Y.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Preston Coleman, Appellant.
Attorneys
- APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
- Steven J. Cohen and Philip L. Weinstein for appellant.
- Mario Merola, District Attorney (Stacey K. Edelbaum and Billie Manning of counsel), for respondent.
majority
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Appellant was convicted after a jury trial of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03). The only issue raised on this appeal is whether the trial court’s charge on the issue of causation deprived defendant of a fair trial. Defendant contends that two isolated remarks made by the trial court, during its instructions, one of them unpreserved, removed from the jury the factual question of whether the shooting caused the death of Raul Melendes. Taken out of context, it is possible to find error in the court’s comments. When its instructions are viewed in their entirety, however, the charge was unquestionably a correct statement of the law and reserved the question of causation to the jury and upon our review of the record, there is no basis for concluding that the jury could not follow the court’s instructions (see, People v Adams, 69 NY2d 805, 806; People v Goodfriend, 64 NY2d 695, 697; People v Canty, 60 NY2d 831, 832).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Chat with this case using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.