Pauline v. Fitzpatrick

Cal. Dist. Ct. App.

Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California

Citations: 154 Cal. App. 2d 872, 318 P.2d 84, 1957 Cal. App. LEXIS 1715

Decision Date: 10/7/1957

Docket Number: Civ. No. 17593

Jurisdiction: CA

Bluebook Citation: Pauline v. Fitzpatrick, 154 Cal. App. 2d 872, 318 P.2d 84, 1957 Cal. App. LEXIS 1715 (Cal. Dist. Ct. App. 1957)

More Cases: Cal. Dist. Ct. App. decisions from 1957


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 3% most-cited · cited by 71 decisions
71
Citing decisions
1
Authorities cited
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

5
22
7
9
14
8
6
1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s

Courts citing this case

Cal. Ct. App.30
Cal. Dist. Ct. App.13
Wash.5
Cal.4
Or.4
Or. Ct. App.4
Most recently cited by10
  • 2018Copeland v. Healthsouth/Methodist Rehab. Hosp., LP Tenn.
  • 2016Ace American Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. Cal. Ct. App.
  • 2012Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corp. v. Firstgroup America, Inc. Wash.
  • 2012Allianz Global Risk U.S. Insurance v. General Electric Co. 9th Cir.
  • 2011Farmers Insurance v. American Family Mutual Insurance Or. Ct. App.
  • 2010Certain Underwriters v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Or. Ct. App.
  • 2008Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. USF Ins. Co. Wash.
  • 2008Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. USF Insurance Wash.
  • 2008Crowley Maritime Corp. v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Cal. Ct. App.
  • 2006Cascade Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co. Or. Ct. App.
Cites 1 case
  • Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

REVEREND MOTHER MARY PAULINE et al., Appellants, v. TIMOTHY I. FITZPATRICK, as Judge of the Superior Court, et al., Respondents.

majority BRAY, J.

Motion by respondents to dismiss appeal on ground of failure of appellants to file opening brief. Motion by appellants to stay appeal.

A complete history of the proceedings in this matter is set forth in Estate of Doran, No. 17513, this day decided (see Estate of Doran, ante, p. 230 [316 P.2d 83].)

For the reasons set forth in said decision the motion to stay appeal is denied and the motion to dismiss is granted.

Peters, P. J., and Wood (Fred B.), J., concurred.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.