Morford v. United States

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 339 U.S. 258, 70 S. Ct. 586, 94 L. Ed. 2d 815, 94 L. Ed. 815, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2128, SCDB 1949-062

Decision Date: 4/10/1950

Docket Number: No. 236

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Morford v. United States, 339 U.S. 258, 70 S. Ct. 586, 94 L. Ed. 2d 815, 94 L. Ed. 815, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2128, SCDB 1949-062 (1950)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1950

MORFORD v. UNITED STATES.

Judges

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Frankfurter concur in the reversal for the reasons expressed in their opinions in Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 162.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Attorneys

Abraham J. Isserman, David Rein and Joseph Forer for' petitioner.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell and Robert S. Erdahl for the United States.

majority Per Curiam.

In this case the trial court did not permit counsel for petitioner to interrogate prospective government employee jurors upon voir dire examination with specific reference to the possible influence of the “Loyalty Order,” Executive Order No. 9835, on their ability to render a just and impartial verdict. Such questioning was permitted in Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 162; see n. 4 of the Court’s opinion, ante, pp. 170-171.

We said in Dennis that “Preservation of the opportunity to prove actual bias is a guarantee of a defendant’s right to an impartial jury.” Ante, pp. 171-172. Since that opportunity was denied in this case, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Reversed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Frankfurter concur in the reversal for the reasons expressed in their opinions in Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 162.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.