Moon v. State
Tex. Crim. App.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2023Shaquetta Mays v. the State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2020Baron Vaughan Utzman v. State Tex. App.
- 2019Michael Homer Reyna v. State Tex. App.
- 2018Charleston Singletary v. State Tex. App.
- 2018Johnathon Ramey v. State Tex. App.
- 2017Enrique Gonzalo Euan v. State Tex. App.
- 2017Christopher Gutierrez v. State Tex. App.
- 2016Emanuel McLemore v. State Tex. App.
- 2015Schofield, Ronald Wayne Tex. App.
- 2015Tyler David Ebanks v. State Tex. App.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Henry Earl MOON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges
- DOUGLAS, J., joins this dissent.
Attorneys
- Ealy A. Bennett, Moncie Rasmus, Jr., Houston, for appellant.
- Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., Alvin M. Titus and Gerard Guerinot, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, for the State.
OPINION ON THE STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
DALLY, Judge.
The majority of the Court now adopts for its opinion the dissenting opinion on original submission. The “straw man” argument presented, the assumptions made, and the discussions concerning the voluntar-iness of the plea, in the opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, are wholly irrelevant. The record reflects that the appellant was carefully admonished concerning his guilty plea and that his constitutional rights were fully protected, but in view of the opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part a portion of the record will be incorporated in an appendix to this opinion. This portion of the record shows the appellant was fully and completely admonished and that he was accorded due process.
The State’s Motion for Rehearing is granted; the judgment is affirmed.