Miller v. United States
U.S.
Miller et al. v. United States. Kaplan v. United States. Ewing, dba Action Publishing Co. v. United States. Miller v. United States. Cangiano et al. v. United States.
Judges
- Me. Justice Douglas would grant cer-tiorari and reverse the judgments. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 37.
- joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall,
majority
C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 431 F. 2d 655;
Ct. App. D. C. Reported below: 277 A. 2d 477;
C. A. 10th Cir. Reported below: 445 F. 2d 945;
C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 455 F. 2d 899; and
C. A. 2d Cir. Reported below: 475 F. 2d 1393. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded to the respective United States Courts of Appeals for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.
Me. Justice Douglas would grant cer-tiorari and reverse the judgments. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 37.
Chat with this case using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.