McClinton v. State

Tex. Crim. App.

Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Citations: 121 S.W.3d 768, 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 925, 2003 WL 22902846

Decision Date: 12/10/2003

Docket Number: No. 587-01

Jurisdiction: TX

Bluebook Citation: McClinton v. State, 121 S.W.3d 768, 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 925, 2003 WL 22902846 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003)

More Cases: Tex. Crim. App. decisions from 2003


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 9% most-cited · cited by 36 decisions
36
Citing decisions
1
Authorities cited
4
Courts citing

Citations by decade

15
16
5
2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

Tex. App.31
Tex. Crim. App.3
Tex.1
Tex. App.-Edinburg-Corpus Christi1
Most recently cited by10
  • 2026The State of Texas v. Andrew Smith Tex. App.-Edinburg-Corpus Christi
  • 2024Christopher Ballard v. the State of Texas Tex. App.
  • 2022Jason Jacob Osifo v. the State of Texas Tex. App.
  • 2020State v. Manuel Gonzalez Tex. App.
  • 2015Robert James Martin III v. State Tex. App.
  • 2015Barnett, Raymond Earl Tex.
  • 2015Lature Robert Irvin v. State Tex. App.
  • 2014Conner Benjamin Polen v. State Tex. App.
  • 2014in Re Randall B. Millslagle Tex. App.
  • 2012Blair Duane Wright v. State Tex. App.
Cites 1 case
  • McClinton v. State

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

Harold McCLINTON, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas.

Judges

  • COCHRAN, J., filed a concurring opinion.
  • HERVEY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which JOHNSON, J., joined.

Attorneys

  • R. Scott Shearer, Houston, for Appellant.
  • Betty Marshall, Assistant State’s Attorney, Matthew Paul, State’s Attorney, Austin, for State.
majority PER CURIAM.

The opinion was delivered

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and sentenced to twelve years in prison. Twenty days after his conviction and sentencing, the trial judge modified McClinton’s sentence to ten years in prison. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to address whether a trial court has the power to reform a defendant’s sentence after the defendant has already begun serving the sentence. We have determined that our decision to grant review was improvident. Therefore, the petition is dismissed.

COCHRAN, J., filed a concurring opinion.

HERVEY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which JOHNSON, J., joined.

. McClinton v. State, 38 S.W.3d 747, 751 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2001).

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.