Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.
N.J.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Frequently CitedTop 11% most-cited · cited by 28 decisions
28
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
2
15
5
4
2
1970s1980s1990s2000s2020s
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2024Charles Cuccia v. Local Finance Board N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
- 2020IN THE MATTER OF DAWN SHYNER, LIEUTENANT 5217 (NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF STATE POLICE) N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
- 2009LoBiondo v. Schwartz N.J.
- 2009Brunson v. Affinity Federal Credit Union N.J.
- 2004Epperson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
- 2001Wilson v. Amerada Hess Corp. N.J.
- 1998State v. Pyatt N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
- 1996Cushman & Wakefield of New Jersey, Inc. v. Alexander Summer Co. N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
- 1994Giri v. Rutgers Casualty Insurance N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
- 1993Venuto v. Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi & Stewart, P.C. 3d Cir.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOR CORPORATION, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AND TELDISCO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Attorneys
- Mr. Meyer E. Ruback argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Ruback, Albach & Weisman and Mr. Alfred C. Clapp, attorneys).
- Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent Thor Corporation.
- Mr. Sol D. Kapelsohn argued the cause for the respondent Teldisco, Inc. (Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, attorneys).
majority
The orders will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinions of Judge Erancis in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wachenpeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan —6.
For reversal — None.