Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.

N.J.

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Citations: 9 N.J. 605, 89 A.2d 242, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 338

Decision Date: 6/16/1952

Jurisdiction: NJ

Bluebook Citation: Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp., 9 N.J. 605, 89 A.2d 242, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 338 (N.J. 1952)

More Cases: N.J. decisions from 1952

MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOR CORPORATION, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AND TELDISCO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Attorneys

Mr. Meyer E. Ruback argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Ruback, Albach & Weisman and Mr. Alfred C. Clapp, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent Thor Corporation.
Mr. Sol D. Kapelsohn argued the cause for the respondent Teldisco, Inc. (Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, attorneys).

majority Per Curiam.

The orders will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinions of Judge Erancis in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wachenpeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan —6.

For reversal — None.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.