May v. Tandy Corp.

Ohio

Court: Supreme Court of Ohio

Citations: 69 Ohio St. 3d 415, 633 N.E.2d 504

Decision Date: 6/1/1994

Docket Number: No. 93-1402

Jurisdiction: OH

Bluebook Citation: May v. Tandy Corp., 69 Ohio St. 3d 415, 633 N.E.2d 504 (Ohio 1994)

More Cases: Ohio decisions from 1994


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 2% most-cited · cited by 89 decisions
89
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

32
37
11
9
1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

Ohio Ct. App.48
Ohio28
6th Cir.3
Ohio App. Ct.3
S.D. Ohio3
Franklin Cty. C.P.1
Most recently cited by10
  • 2024N. Side Bank & Trust Co. v. Trinity Aviation, L.L.C. Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2024State v. Johnson Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2023Thomas v. Logue Ohio
  • 2022State v. Delvallie Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2022State v. Parker Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2022Brandt v. Pompa Ohio
  • 2022Grayson v. Cleveland Clinic Found. Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2021McClain v. State Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2020Community Hosps. & Wellness Ctrs. v. State Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2019State v. Philpotts Ohio Ct. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

May, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Tandy Corporation, Appellee; Diamantis, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

Judges

  • AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
  • Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent. .

Attorneys

  • Nurenberg, Plevin, Heller & McCarthy Co., L.P.A, Richard C. Alkire, Jeffrey A Leikin and Sandra J. Rosenthal, for appellant and cross-appellee.
  • William J. Coyne & Associates Co., L.P.A, Terrance P. Gravens and Michael E. Stinn, for appellee and cross-appellant.
majority

The judgment on appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of Sorrell v. Thevenir (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 415, 633 N.E.2d 504, decided today. The cross-appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent. .

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.