Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 493 U.S. 874, 107 L. Ed. 2d 158, 110 S. Ct. 205, 58 U.S.L.W. 3218, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 4592

Decision Date: 10/2/1989

Docket Number: No. 88-2112; No. 88-7180; No. 88-7217; No. 88-7222; No. 88-7427; No. 88-7469; No. 88-7492; No. 88-7520; No. 88-7557; No. 88-7567; No. 88-7620; No. 89-5037; No. 89-5038; No. 89-5040; No. 89-5060; No. 89-5071; No. 89-5092; No. 89-5093; No. 89-5099; No. 89-5238; No. 89-5254; No. 89-5260; No. 89-5270; No. 89-5399

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona, 493 U.S. 874, 107 L. Ed. 2d 158, 110 S. Ct. 205, 58 U.S.L.W. 3218, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 4592 (1989)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1989

Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona. Jarrells v. Georgia. Games v. Indiana. Tassin v. Louisiana. Baldwin v. Alabama. O’Neal v. Missouri. Kubat v. Greer, Warden, et al. Moran v. Whitley, Warden, et al. Singleton v. Lockhart, Commissioner, Arkansas Department of Correction. Jones v. Missouri. Padilla v. Nevada. Hill v. Alabama. Brownlee v. Alabama. Thompson v. Alabama. Coleman v. Oklahoma. Derrick v. Texas. Crank v. Texas. Cavanaugh v. Nevada. Kinsman v. Georgia. Driscoll v. Missouri. Singleton v. McKellar, Warden, et al. Teague v. Tennessee. Melson v. Tennessee. Kilgore v. Missouri.

majority

Super. Ct. Ariz., County of Santa Cruz;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Ind.;

Sup. Ct. La.;

Ct. Crim. App. Ala.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

C. A. 7th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Nev.;

C. A. 8th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

Sup. Ct. New;

Ct. Crim. App. Ala.;

Sup. Ct. Ala.;

Ct. Crim. App. Okla.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Sup. Ct. New;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

C. A. 4th Cir.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.;

Sup. Ct. Tenn.; and

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certio-rari denied. Reported below: No. 88-7180, 258 Ga. 833, 375 S. E. 2d 842; No. 88-7217, 535 N. E. 2d 530; No. 88-7222, 536 So. 2d 402; No. 88-7427, 539 So. 2d 1103; No. 88-7469, 766 S. W. 2d 91; No. 88-7492, 867 F. 2d 351; No. 88-7520, 105 Nev. 1041, 810 P. 2d 335; No. 88-7557, 871 F. 2d 1395; No. 88-7567, 767 S. W. 2d 41; No. 88-7620, 104 Nev. 867; No. 89-5037, 541 So. 2d 83; No. 89-5038, 545 So. 2d 166; No. 89-5040, 542 So. 2d 1300; No. 89-5071, 773 S. W. 2d 271; No. 89-5092, 761 S. W. 2d 328; No. 89-5093, 105 Nev. 1025, 810 P. 2d 319; No. 89-5099, 259 Ga. 89, 376 S. E. 2d 845; No. 89-5238, 767 S. W. 2d 5; No. 89-5254, 873 F. 2d 1440; No. 89-5260, 772 S. W. 2d 915; No. 89-5270, 772 S. W. 2d 417; No. 89-5399, 771 S. W. 2d 57.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.