Marder v. Massachusetts

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 377 U.S. 407, 12 L. Ed. 2d 405, 84 S. Ct. 1626, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1146, SCDB 1963-131

Decision Date: 6/1/1964

Docket Number: No. 819

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Marder v. Massachusetts, 377 U.S. 407, 12 L. Ed. 2d 405, 84 S. Ct. 1626, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1146, SCDB 1963-131 (1964)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1964


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Frequently CitedTop 24% most-cited · cited by 10 decisions
10
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

2
4
2
1
1
1960s1970s1980s2000s2010s

Courts citing this case

Mass.2
Mass. App. Ct.2
4th Cir.1
D. Mass.1
Ill. App. Ct.1
Mass. App. Div.1
Most recently cited by10
  • 2019Belezos v. Board of Selectmen of Hingham, Massachusetts D. Mass.
  • 2004Commonwealth v. Weiss Mass. App. Div.
  • 1988Commonwealth v. Mongardi Mass. App. Ct.
  • 1984People v. Robinson Ill. App. Ct.
  • 1979Commonwealth v. Germano Mass.
  • 1976Covington v. City of Raleigh 4th Cir.
  • 1974Commonwealth v. Hesser Mass. App. Ct.
  • 1971People v. Carter Oneida Cty. Ct.
  • 1966Massachusetts Port Authority v. Clerk of the East Boston District Court Mass.
  • 1964Vann v. Baggett U.S.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

MARDER v. MASSACHUSETTS.

Judges

  • with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins,
  • Mr. Justice White is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Attorneys

  • Appellant pro se.
  • Edward W. Brooke, Attorney General of Massachusetts, for appellee.
majority Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.