MacKenna v. Ellis

5th Cir.

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Citations: 289 F.2d 928, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4637

Decision Date: 5/2/1961

Docket Number: No. 18110

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: MacKenna v. Ellis, 289 F.2d 928, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4637 (5th Cir. 1961)

More Cases: 5th Cir. decisions from 1961


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 1% most-cited · cited by 98 decisions
98
Citing decisions
4
Authorities cited
1
statute cited
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

16
21
60
1
1960s1970s1980s1990s

Courts citing this case

5th Cir.41
11th Cir.14
Cal.4
Tex. App.4
9th Cir.3
M.D. Fla.3
Most recently cited by10
  • 1998United States v. Williams S.D. Miss.
  • 1989Lavigne v. State Tex. App.
  • 1987Moore v. Morris W.D. Mo.
  • 1984Collins v. Francis 11th Cir.
  • 1984Solomon v. Kemp 11th Cir.
  • 1984Corenevsky v. Superior Court Cal.
  • 1984Griffin v. Wainwright M.D. Fla.
  • 1984Dobbert v. Wainwright M.D. Fla.
  • 1984Henderson v. State Tex. App.
  • 1984Cano v. State Tex. App.
Cites 1 statute
  • Determination
Cites 3 cases

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

Edward Morgan MacKENNA, Appellant, v. O. B. ELLIS, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Appellee.

Attorneys

  • Martin L. C. Feldman, New Orleans, La., Edward Morgan MacKenna, Austin, Tex., for appellant.
  • John L. Estes, Linward Shivers, Tom I. McFarling, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
majority PER CURIAM.

On the Court’s own motion, our decision reported as MacKenna v. Ellis, 5 Cir., 1960, 280 F.2d 592, has been considered on rehearing before the Court en banc. The opinion and decision are modified in one respect only.

In lieu of the directions at the conclusion of the opinion as quoted in the margin, the following is substituted:

The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded with directions grant the writ, vacate the judgment of conviction, and make such disposition of the petitioner as law and justice may require at the time of the entry of the final order.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

. “The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded with directions to grant the writ and discharge the petitioner. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2106.

“Reversed and Remanded with directions.” 280 F.2d at pages 604, 605.

. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2106; United States ex rel. Almeida v. Baldi, 3 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 815, 825, 33 A.L.R.2d 1407; Mitchell v. Youell, 4 Cir., 1942, 130 F.2d 880, 882; 15 Am.Jur., Criminal Law, § 364; 25 Am.Jur. Habeas Corpus, § 157; 22 C.J.S. Criminal Law §§ 266, 267; 39 C.J.S. Habeas Corpus § 102.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.