Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co.

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 36 N.Y.2d 754, 368 N.Y.S.2d 830, 329 N.E.2d 664, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1791

Decision Date: 3/20/1975

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co., 36 N.Y.2d 754, 368 N.Y.S.2d 830, 329 N.E.2d 664, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1791 (1975)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1975


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 2% most-cited · cited by 86 decisions
86
Citing decisions
1
Authorities cited
3
Courts citing

Citations by decade

36
48
2
1970s1980s1990s

Courts citing this case

N.Y.81
N.Y. App. Div.3
N.Y. Sup. Ct.2
Most recently cited by10
  • 1995Burke v. Crosson N.Y.
  • 1993HHM Associates, Inc. v. Appleton N.Y. Sup. Ct.
  • 1989Riverbay Corp. v. Steiner N.Y. Sup. Ct.
  • 1988Bethpage Water District v. Hendrickson Bros. N.Y. App. Div.
  • 1986Robinson v. Robinson N.Y.
  • 1984Mazur v. Ryan N.Y.
  • 1984Guthartz v. City of New York N.Y.
  • 1983Royal Globe Insurance v. Chock Full O'Nuts Corp. N.Y.
  • 1983Chemical Bank v. Louis Sternbach & Co. N.Y.
  • 1983John W. Cowper Co. v. Buffalo Hotel Development Venture N.Y.
Cites 1 case
  • Behren v. Papworth

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

Lizza Industries, Inc., Appellant, v Long Island Lighting Company, Respondent.

Attorneys

  • Carlino Pearsall & Soviero for appellant.
majority

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and that the doctrine of implied severance is not applicable because the finally determined cause of action is not discrete from the transactions giving rise to counterclaims which are not finally determined. (See Behren v Papworth, 30 NY2d 532; Walker v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 36 NY2d 695; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, pp 81, 84-93.)

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.