Livingston v. United States

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 364 U.S. 281, 4 L. Ed. 2d 1719, 80 S. Ct. 1611, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 771

Decision Date: 6/27/1960

Docket Number: No. 895

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Livingston v. United States, 364 U.S. 281, 4 L. Ed. 2d 1719, 80 S. Ct. 1611, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 771 (1960)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1960

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 2% most-cited · cited by 67 decisions

Citing decisions

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2020s

Courts citing this case

U.S.7

4th Cir.4

5th Cir.4

2d Cir.3

9th Cir.3

10th Cir.2

Most recently cited by10

2021IN THE MATTER OF THE ASSESSMENTS FOR TAX YEAR 2012 OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES Okla.
2002Abraham v. Hodges D.S.C.
1997Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services of Central Arkansas U.S.
1991Scotsman Manufacturing Co. v. State Nev.
1990United States v. Broward County 11th Cir.
1990United States v. Benton W.D. Mo.
1989Ferguson v. United States N.D. Cal.
1988Alliance of American Insurers v. Cuomo 2d Cir.
1987United States v. Hawkins County E.D. Tenn.
1985United States v. Montgomery County 4th Cir.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

LIVINGSTON et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.

Judges

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Attorneys

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and James M. Windham and James S. Vemer, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Myron C. Baum, Loren K. Olson and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States and the Atomic Energy Commission, appellees.
Hugh K. Clark and W. Graham Claytor, Jr. for E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., appellee.

majority Per Curiam.

The motion to substitute Harold Murph and Robert C. Wasson in the place of Francis M. Pickney and James W. Crain as parties appellant is granted. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted.