Levine v. Commissioner
2d Cir.
Lazarus I. LEVINE and Norman L. Marks, Executors of the Estate of Samuel Stein, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Attorneys
- Murray L. Brinn, New York City, for petitioners-appellants.
- Grant W. Wiprud, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John N. Stull and A. F. Prescott, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent-appellee.
majority
The income tax deficiencies for 1944 and 1945 here assessed against the estate of the deceased taxpayer, Samuel Stein, were based upon findings that certain proceeds of sales of goods in Stein’s bank accounts really represented sales by Stein’s wholly owned corporation and thus were taxable first as income to the corporation and then as dividends to Stein. These findings are not here challenged, but petitioners by a motion to revise the opinion and decision of the Tax Court raised the issue that Stein had actually paid for the original purchase of goods thus sold and petitioners could therefore take the purchase price as a deduction in computing the tax. But the Tax Court in denying the motion found the evidence that such payments came from Stein, rather than his corporation, insufficient to sustain petitioners’ burden and held that the purchase price was to be attributed to the corporation. This is the sole issue on appeal. We do not find the court’s holding clearly erroneous and affirm on Judge Black’s original opinion, Estate of Stein v. C. I. R., 25 T.C. 940, and on his memorandum opinion accompanying the order denying the motion to revise.
Affirmed.
Chat with this case using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.