Kremen v. United States
U.S.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2023United States v. Haitao Xiang 8th Cir.
- 2022State v. M. Zeimer Mont.
- 2013United States v. Cotterman 9th Cir.
- 2008United States v. Seljan 9th Cir.
- 1990United States v. Ezeiruaku E.D. Pa.
- 1990Locks v. Three Unidentified Customs Service Agents E.D. Pa.
- 1989United States v. James T. Branch 6th Cir.
- 1987Bass v. State Tex. Crim. App.
- 1983United States v. Waxman E.D. Pa.
- 1982United States v. Alleyne C.M.A.
Cites 2 statutes
- Accessory after the fact
- Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
Cites 1 case
- Kremen v. United States
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
KREMEN et al. v. UNITED STATES.
Judges
- Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Attorneys
- Norman Leonard argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners.
- Kevin T. Maroney argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Harold D. Koff-sky, Philip R. Monahan and Carl G. Coben.
Of petitioners’ various contentions we find the one relating to the validity of the search and seizure made by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation disposi-tive of this case, and we therefore need not consider the others.
The indictment charged the three petitioners with relieving, comforting, and assisting one Thompson, a fugitive from justice, in violation of 18 U. S. C. § 3, and with conspiring to commit that offense in violation of 18 U. S. C. § 371. In addition, it charged petitioners Kremen and Coleman with harboring Steinberg, also a fugitive from justice, and with conspiring to commit that offense. Petitioners were found guilty, and on appeal their convictions were sustained, one judge dissenting. 231 F. 2d 155. Because of the unusual character of the search and seizure here involved, we granted certiorari, without, however, limiting the writ. 352 U. S. 819.
Thompson and Steinberg had been fugitives from justice for about two years when agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation discovered them, in the company of Kremen, Coleman and another, at a secluded cabin near the village of Twain Harte, California. After keeping the cabin under surveillance for some 24 hours, the officers arrested the three petitioners and Thompson. Thompson and Steinberg were arrested outside the cabin; Kremen and Coleman, inside. The agents possessed outstanding arrest warrants for Thompson and Steinberg, but none for Kremen and Coleman. These four individuals were searched and documents found on their persons were seized. In addition, an exhaustive search of the cabin and a seizure of its entire contents were made shortly after the arrests. The agents possessed no search warrant. The property seized from the house was taken to the F. B. I. office at San Francisco for further examination. A copy of the F. B. I.’s inventory of the property thus taken is printed in the appendix to this opinion, post, p. 349.
The majority of the Court are agreed that objections to the validity of the search and seizure were adequately raised and preserved. The seizure of the entire contents of the house and its removal some two hundred miles away to the F. B. I. offices for the purpose of examination are beyond the sanction of any of our cases. While the evidence seized from the persons of the petitioners might have been legally admissible, the introduction against each of petitioners of some items seized in the house in the manner aforesaid rendered the guilty verdicts illegal. The convictions must therefore be reversed, with instructions to grant the petitioners a new trial.
Reversed.