Kimbell-Diamond Milling Co. v. Commissioner
5th Cir.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2004Charles Schwab Corp. v. Commissioner T.C.
- 2004The Charles Schwab Corporation and Subsidiaries, Petitioner T.C.
- 1994Kraft, Inc. v. United States Fed. Cl.
- 1993Donlon I Dev. Corp. v. Commissioner Tax Ct.
- 1986Cannonsburg Skiing Corp. v. Commissioner Tax Ct.
- 1984Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States Cl. Ct.
- 1984Martinson Manufacturing Co. v. Seery Iowa
- 1983Hall v. Commissioner Tax Ct.
- 1982New York Fruit Auction Corp. v. Commissioner T.C.
- 1982Everhart v. Commissioner Tax Ct.
Cites 1 case
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
KIMBELL-DIAMOND MILLING CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
Attorneys
- R. B. Cannon, Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner.
- George D. Webster, Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles Oliphant, Chief Counsel, Claude R. Marshall, Special Attorney, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
The correctness vel non of the challenged deficiencies, determined by the commissioner and approved and adopted by the Tax Court, turns on whether the taxpayer petitioner is right in insisting that assets acquired by it ’by first purchasing the stock of, and then liquidating, Whaley Company should be included in petitioner’s basis at their cost to Whaley or whether the commissioner is right in insisting that they should he included at the cost to petitioner of Whaley’s stock.
The facts are fully reported and the law of the case is correctly and adequately set forth in the opinion and decision of the Tax Court. It will, therefore, serve no useful purpose for us to again set down the facts and again canvass and state the controlling findings and conclusions which determined there and determine here what the decision should be. It will be sufficient for us to say that we are in full agreement with the findings and conclusions of the Tax Court and with the reasoning on which they are based.
So agreeing, in spite of petitioner’s earnest and vigorous attack upon them by brief and oral argument, we deny the petition for review and affirm the attacked order for the reasons and upon the considerations advanced by the Tax Court.
Affirmed.
. Kimbell-Diamond Milling Co. v. Commissioner, 14 T.C. 74.