Jones v. Opelika

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 319 U.S. 103, 87 L. Ed. 1290, 63 S. Ct. 890, SCDB 1942-153, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 710

Decision Date: 5/3/1943

Docket Number: No. 280

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Jones v. Opelika, 319 U.S. 103, 87 L. Ed. 1290, 63 S. Ct. 890, SCDB 1942-153, 1943 U.S. LEXIS 710 (1943)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1943

JONES v. OPELIKA.

Attorneys

Mr. Hayden C. Covington for petitioners.
No appearance for respondents in Nos. 280 and 314, and appellee in No. 966.
Briefs of amici curiae were filed by Mr. Osmond K. Fraenkel, on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union, in support of the petition for rehearing; and by Mr. Elisha Hanson, on behalf of the American Newspaper Publishers Association, and Messrs. Homer Cummings and Millward C. Taft, on behalf of the General Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists, in support of the petition for rehearing and urging reversal.

majority Pee Curiam

(announced by Me. Justice Douglas) :

The judgments in these cases were affirmed at the October Term, 1941. 316 U. S. 584. Because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with Murdock v. Pennsylvania, post, p. 105. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court in the Murdock case, and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the Court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. The judgments of this Court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed.

So ordered.

For dissenting opinions, see post, pp. 117-140.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.