Jones v. Healing

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 373 U.S. 758, 10 L. Ed. 2d 703, 83 S. Ct. 1559, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1398

Decision Date: 6/3/1963

Docket Number: No. 985

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Jones v. Healing, 373 U.S. 758, 10 L. Ed. 2d 703, 83 S. Ct. 1559, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1398 (1963)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1963

JONES, CHAIRMAN OF NAVAJO TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NAVAJO INDIAN TRIBE, v. HEALING, CHAIRMAN OF HOPI COUNCIL OF HOPI INDIAN TRIBE, et al.

Judges

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and would decide the cases only after argument.

Attorneys

Norman M. Littell and Frederick Bemays Wiener for appellant in No. 985 and for appellee Jones in No. 1050.
John 8. Boyden, Allen H. Tibbals and Bryant H. Croft for appellants in No. 1050 and for appellee Healing in No. 985. ■ ■

majority Per Curiam.

The motion to substitute Raymond Nakai in the place of Paul Jones as the party appellant in No. 985 and as a party appellee 'in No. 1050 is granted. The motion to substitute-Abbott Sekaquaptewa in the place of Dewey Healing as a party appellee in No. 985 and as a party appellant in No. 1050 is granted. The motion to affirm in No. 985 is granted and the judgment which is common to both cases is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and would decide the cases only after argument.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.