Jones v. Healing

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 373 U.S. 758, 10 L. Ed. 2d 703, 83 S. Ct. 1559, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1398

Decision Date: 6/3/1963

Docket Number: No. 985

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Jones v. Healing, 373 U.S. 758, 10 L. Ed. 2d 703, 83 S. Ct. 1559, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1398 (1963)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1963

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 4% most-cited · cited by 51 decisions

Citing decisions

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

9th Cir.23

D. Ariz.12

Ct. Cl.3

Fed. Cl.3

D.C. Cir.2

D.D.C.2

Most recently cited by10

2025Johnnie Fuson v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation 9th Cir.
2025Bitah v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation D. Ariz.
2025NAVAJO NATION v. United States Fed. Cl.
2022Todicheeney v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation D. Ariz.
2022Webb v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation D. Ariz.
2011Navajo Nation v. United States Fed. Cir.
2002Hopi Tribe v. United States Fed. Cl.
1999Clinton v. Babbitt 9th Cir.
1998Karuk Tribe of California v. United States Fed. Cl.
1997Masayesva v. Hale 9th Cir.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

JONES, CHAIRMAN OF NAVAJO TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NAVAJO INDIAN TRIBE, v. HEALING, CHAIRMAN OF HOPI COUNCIL OF HOPI INDIAN TRIBE, et al.

Judges

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and would decide the cases only after argument.

Attorneys

Norman M. Littell and Frederick Bemays Wiener for appellant in No. 985 and for appellee Jones in No. 1050.
John 8. Boyden, Allen H. Tibbals and Bryant H. Croft for appellants in No. 1050 and for appellee Healing in No. 985. ■ ■

majority Per Curiam.

The motion to substitute Raymond Nakai in the place of Paul Jones as the party appellant in No. 985 and as a party appellee 'in No. 1050 is granted. The motion to substitute-Abbott Sekaquaptewa in the place of Dewey Healing as a party appellee in No. 985 and as a party appellant in No. 1050 is granted. The motion to affirm in No. 985 is granted and the judgment which is common to both cases is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and would decide the cases only after argument.