Independent Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 344 U.S. 837, 73 S. Ct. 14, 97 L. Ed. 652, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2747

Decision Date: 10/13/1952

Docket Number: No. 74

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Independent Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 344 U.S. 837, 73 S. Ct. 14, 97 L. Ed. 652, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2747 (1952)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1952


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 8% most-cited · cited by 38 decisions
38
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

13
11
14
1950s1960s1970s

Courts citing this case

N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.18
N.J.13
N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div.4
Md.1
Miss.1
N.J. Super. Ct. Ch. Div.1
Most recently cited by10
  • 1978New Jersey State Plumbing Inspectors Ass'n v. Sheehan N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 1977Leonardis v. Bunnell N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div.
  • 1977Penwag Property Co. v. Landau N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 1977Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson County Park Commission N.J.
  • 1976Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson County Park Commission N.J.
  • 1975Stroinski v. Office of Public Defender N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 1974State v. Deegan N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 1974State v. Hanly N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 1974Ayres v. Dauchert N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 1974State v. Furey N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

Independent Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission.

Judges

  • Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Attorneys

  • Harold E. Mott and Robert L. Heald for petitioner.
  • Solicitor General Perlman, Benedict P. Cottone and Richard A. Solomon for respondent.
majority

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.