In re the Arbitration between Town of Callicoon & Civil Service Employees Ass'n

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 70 N.Y.2d 907, 524 N.Y.S.2d 389, 519 N.E.2d 300, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 19947

Decision Date: 12/21/1987

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: In re the Arbitration between Town of Callicoon & Civil Service Employees Ass'n, 70 N.Y.2d 907, 524 N.Y.S.2d 389, 519 N.E.2d 300, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 19947 (1987)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1987


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 2% most-cited · cited by 109 decisions
109
Citing decisions
4
Authorities cited
4
Courts citing

Citations by decade

6
56
39
8
1980s1990s2000s2010s

Courts citing this case

N.Y. App. Div.103
N.Y.3
N.Y. Sup. Ct.2
NY1
Most recently cited by10
  • 2017Faltynowicz v. Battery Park City Auth. (In re World Trade Ctr. Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig.) N.Y.
  • 2017The Matter of World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster , Site Litigation. NY
  • 2016Klein v. Pereira N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2012In re the Arbitration between Ulster County Sheriff's Employees Ass'n, CWA Local 1105 & Ulster County Sheriff's Department N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2011Romaine v. New York City Transit Authority N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2011Seneca Insurance v. Ruday Realty Corp. N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2011County of Putnam v. Putnam County Sheriff's Employees Ass'n N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2010Local 456, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. City of Yonkers N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2009In re the Arbitration between Kowaleski & New York State Department of Correctional Services N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2008In re the Arbitration between Local 2841 of New York State Law Enforcement Officers Union & City of Albany N.Y. App. Div.
Cites 4 cases

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

In the Matter of the Arbitration between Town of Callicoon, Respondent, and Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Town of Callicoon Unit, Appellant.

Attorneys

  • APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
  • Barton W. Bloom for appellant.
  • Frederick W. V. Schadt, Jr., for respondent.
majority

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court reinstated.

Where a dispute has been arbitrated pursuant to a broad arbitration agreement between the parties, the resulting award may not be vacated unless it is violative of a strong public policy, is totally irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator’s power (Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 NY2d 299, 308; Matter of Board of Educ. v Dover-Wingdale Teachers’ Assn., 61 NY2d 913; Matter of Local Div. 1179 [Green Bus Lines], 50 NY2d 1007; Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 NY2d 578).

Here, the arbitration was conducted pursuant to a broad arbitration clause in the parties’ collective bargaining agreement, which empowered the arbitrator to resolve disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the agreement, subject only to the limitation that the arbitrator could not add to or subtract from the agreement (see, Matter of Town of Haverstraw [Rockland County Patrolmen’s Benevolent Assn.] 65 NY2d 677; Matter of Local Div. 1179 [Green Bus Lines], supra; Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 NY2d 623).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.