Hart v. Hudson River Bridge Co.

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 80 N.Y. 622, 1880 N.Y. LEXIS 137

Decision Date: 2/3/1880

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: Hart v. Hudson River Bridge Co., 80 N.Y. 622, 1880 N.Y. LEXIS 137 (1880)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1880


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 4% most-cited · cited by 82 decisions
82
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

15
38
8
4
5
10
1
1
1880s1890s1900s1910s1920s1930s1940s1950s

Courts citing this case

N.Y. App. Div.33
N.Y. Gen. Term15
N.Y.10
N.Y. Sup. Ct.7
N.Y.C.P.5
N.Y. App. Term3
Most recently cited by10
  • 1955Beutenmiller v. West End Tavern, Inc. N.Y. App. Div.
  • 1942Witkowicz v. Amalgamated Properties, Inc. N.Y. App. Div.
  • 1938Volberg v. Hegeman Farms Co. N.Y. App. Div.
  • 1938Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank N.Y.
  • 1937Cook v. Gillot N.Y. App. Div.
  • 1937Loesing v. T. I. McCormack Trucking Co. N.Y. App. Div.
  • 1937Dandino v. New York Central Railroad N.Y.
  • 1936Hotop v. English & Greenfader, Inc. N.Y. App. Div.
  • 1935Hagen v. American Machine & Foundry Co. N.Y. App. Div.
  • 1935Tortora v. State N.Y.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

John Hart, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Hudson River Bridge Company, at Albany, Respondent.

Attorneys

  • JS. Countryman for appellant.
  • Samuel Hand for respondent.
majority Per Curiam

Opinion for reversal and1 new trial.

All concur, except Folger and Earl, JJ., dissenting.

Judgment reversed.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.