Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 307 U.S. 496, 59 S. Ct. 954, 83 L. Ed. 1423, 4 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 501, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1067, SCDB 1938-045

Decision Date: 6/5/1939

Docket Number: No. 651

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization, 307 U.S. 496, 59 S. Ct. 954, 83 L. Ed. 1423, 4 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 501, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1067, SCDB 1938-045 (1939)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1939


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Landmark AuthorityTop 1% most-cited · cited by 1,428 decisions
1,428
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

12
155
75
150
338
197
186
157
102
56
1930s1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

U.S.80
9th Cir.65
S.D.N.Y.59
3d Cir.44
5th Cir.43
2d Cir.41
Most recently cited by10
  • 2026State of Tennessee v. George Harris Patterson, III Tenn. Crim. App.
  • 2026Malone N.D. Miss.
  • 2026Norris W.D. Ark.
  • 2025Gary Perez and Matilde Torres v. City of San Antonio Tex.
  • 2025Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic SCOTUS
  • 2025Morris v. United States D.C.
  • 2025Madeline Krasno v. Jennifer Mnookin 7th Cir.
  • 2025Young Americas Foundation v. Gene D. Block C.D. Cal.
  • 2025Aquino v. City of Naples M.D. Fla.
  • 2025Patel D. Nev.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

HAGUE, MAYOR, et al. v. COMMITTEE FOR INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION et al.

Judges

  • presiding in the absence of the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice McReynolds:
  • delivered ,an opinion in which Mr. Justice Black

Attorneys

  • Messrs. Charles Hershenstein and Edward J. O’Mara with, whom Messrs. James A. Ham,ill and John A. Matthews were on the brief, for petitioners. See p. 661.
  • Messrs. Morris L. Ernst and Spaulding Frazer, with whom Messrs. Lee Pressman and Benjamin Kaplan were on the brief, for respondents. See p. 668.
majority Mr. Justice Butler,

By leave of Court, the Committee on the Bill of Rights of the American Bar Association, filed a brief, as amid curiae, discussing the right of assembly. See p. 678.

Mr. Justice Butler,

presiding in the absence of the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice McReynolds:

The judgment of the eoúrt in this case is that the decree is modified and as modified affirmed. Mr. Justice Eéankfurter and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Mr. Justice Roberts has an opinion in which Mr. Justice Black concurs, and Mr. Justice Stone an opinion in which Mr. Justice Reed concurs. The Chief Justice concurs in an opinion. Mr. Justice McReynolds and Mr. Justice Butler dissent for reasons stated in opinions by-them respectively.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.