Fiore v. Galang

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 64 N.Y.2d 999, 489 N.Y.S.2d 47, 478 N.E.2d 188, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16687

Decision Date: 3/28/1985

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: Fiore v. Galang, 64 N.Y.2d 999, 489 N.Y.S.2d 47, 478 N.E.2d 188, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16687 (1985)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1985

Esther K. Fiore et al., Appellants, v Dominador Galang et al., Defendants, and Benedictine Hospital, Respondent.

Attorneys

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
David D. Glass for appellants.
Norman Bard for respondent.

majority

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree that absent a sufficient affidavit of merits it was error, as a matter of law, not to grant defendant Hospital’s motion for summary judgment (Kel Mgt. Corp. v Rogers & Wells, 64 NY2d 904; Canter v Mulnick, 60 NY2d 689; Stolowitz v Mount Sinai Hosp., 60 NY2d 685). Moreover, in light of plaintiffs’ argument that the verified complaint should be accepted as an affidavit of merits (CPLR 105 [t]), we note that, except as to matters within the ordinary experience and knowledge of laymen, in a medical malpractice action, expert medical opinion evidence is required to demonstrate merit (cf. Meiselman v Crown Hgts. Hosp., 285 NY 389). This malpractice claim is for negligence in the failure to diagnose cancer and in the performance of an abdominal operation, which are not matters within the ordinary experience of laypersons.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.