Ex parte Rodriguez
Tex. Crim. App.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2022Johnson, John William Tex. Crim. App.
- 2022Calderilla, Rolando Tex. Crim. App.
- 2022Vaughn, Tony Edward Tex. Crim. App.
- 2022Elam, Darius Duron Tex. Crim. App.
- 2022Brown, Lisa Ann AKA May, Patricia Suzanne Tex. Crim. App.
- 2022in Re State of Texas Ex Rel. Brent Smith v. Honorable Jan Soifer Tex. Crim. App.
- 2021Mendoza, Jose Concepcion Tex. Crim. App.
- 2021Smith, Justin Wade Tex. Crim. App.
- 2020Dunn, Christan Lee Tex. Crim. App.
- 2020Wheeler, Bradley Michael Tex. Crim. App.
Cites 2 cases
- Ex parte Japan
- Ex parte Fitzpatrick
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Ex Parte Ruben M. Rodriguez
Attorneys
- Relator represented himself.
- Leon Douglas, State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.
The letter of the above named applicant was filed in this court as an original application for habeas corpus.
Relator is confined in jail and complains that the two judgments, each assessing a one year jail term, were not properly cumulated.
This court does not hear evidence.
In proceedings of this character it has been the uniform practice of this court for many years to require that resort be first had to application for habeas corpus to the judge of the trial court or other county court, county court at law or district judge of the county for relief, and an application for habeas corpus originally filed in this court attacking the legality of confinement under a misdemeanor judgment will not otherwise be entertained. 21 Tex. Jur. 445, Habeas Corpus, Sec. 34; Ex parte Fitzpatrick, 167 Tex. Cr. Rep. 376, 320 S.W. 2d 683; Ex parte Japan, 36 Tex. Cr. R. 482, 38 S.W. 43; Ex parte Lynn, 19 Tex. App. 120; Art. 121 V.A.C.C.P.
The application is dismissed.