Ex parte Calvillo Amaya
Tex.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2026In Re Bradley Welsh v. the State of Texas Tex. App.-Fort Worth
- 2023In Re Roseanne Bernard Tavarez v. the State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2023In Re: Noreen Saleem v. the State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2018in Re Kristina Shea Cook Tex. App.
- 2018in Re Christopher P. Lima Tex. App.
- 2014in the Interest of J.D., a Minor Child Tex. App.
- 2014in Re Robert Ruiz Guitierrez, Relator Tex. App.
- 2014in Re Bruce Carter Tex. App.
- 2014In re Griffith Tex. App.
- 2014in Re: Leldon Cook Tex. App.
Cites 3 cases
- Ex parte Spencer
- Ex parte Barnett
- Ex parte Puckitt
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Ex parte Oscar CALVILLO AMAYA a/k/a Oscar Calvillo.
Judges
- CULVER, J., files a concurring opinion in which SPEARS, J., joins.
Attorneys
- Robert E. Golden, and Charles M. Jefferson, Smith, Barshop, Stoffer & Millsap, Inc., San Antonio, for relator.
- Tom Fleming, Brownsville, for respondent.
This is an original habeas corpus proceeding brought by Relator, Oscar Calvillo Amaya, seeking release from the custody of the Sheriff of Cameron County from a commitment order of the 103rd Judicial District Court. The commitment order was verbally delivered on Friday, October 2, 1987 at 5:15 p.m. and formally signed on Monday, October 5, 1987. The court held relator in constructive contempt for violating a previous judgment of that court, ordering him to turn over to a corporate receiver certain equipment located in Mexico.
Since it is well settled in this state that a person may not be imprisoned for contempt without a written order of commitment, we hold that a trial court has no authority to verbally order a person confined for contemptuous acts committed outside the presence of the court and, thereafter, unduly delay signing a contempt judgment and commitment order. See Ex Parte Spencer, 508 S.W.2d 698, 699 (Tex. Civ.App.—Texarkana 1974, no writ). A commitment is a warrant, order or process by which a court or magistrate directs a ministerial officer to take a person to jail or to prison and to detain him there. In order to satisfy due process requirements, both a written judgment of contempt and a written commitment order are necessary to imprison a person for civil constructive contempt of court. Ex Parte Puckitt, 159 Tex. 438, 322 S.W.2d 597 (1959); Ex Parte Barnett, 600 S.W.2d 252, 256 (Tex.1980). An arrest without a written commitment made for the purpose of enforcing a contempt judgment is an illegal restraint from which the prisoner is entitled to be relieved. Ex Parte Puckitt, 322 S.W.2d at 597.
The trial court may cause a contemnor to be detained by the sheriff or other officer for a short and reasonable time while the judgment of contempt and the order of commitment are being prepared for the judge’s signature. Ex Parte Barnett, 600 S.W.2d at 257. We hold that a three-day delay is not a “short and reasonable time” while the documents are being prepared for signature.
To hold otherwise would allow the trial court to place a person in jail indefinitely without any method for the prisoner to obtain his release by purging himself of the contempt and perhaps, without knowledge of why he was being held in contempt. Such proceedings would be in violation of due process. See Ex Parte Spencer, 508 S.W.2d at 700. In view of our holding, it is unnecessary to consider relator’s remaining points of error.
We hold that the order in the instant case violates due process and the relator is ordered discharged from custody under the commitment order issued by the 103rd Judicial District in Cameron County.
CULVER, J., files a concurring opinion in which SPEARS, J., joins.