Ex parte Burford

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 3 Cranch 448, 7 U.S. 448, 2 L. Ed. 495, 1806 U.S. LEXIS 346, SCDB 1806-023

Decision Date: 1806-02

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Ex parte Burford, 3 Cranch 448, 7 U.S. 448, 2 L. Ed. 495, 1806 U.S. LEXIS 346, SCDB 1806-023 (U.S. 1806)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1806

Ex parte Burford.

Attorneys

  • Hiort, for the petitioner,
  • Hiort, for the prisoner,
  • Swann, on the same side,
majority

The Judges of this Court were unanimously of opinion, that the warrant of commitment was illegal, for want of stating some good cause certain, supported by oath. If the circuit court had proceeded de novo, perhaps, it might have made a difference. But this court is of opinion, that that court has gone only upon the proceedings before the justices. It has gone so far as to correct two of the errors committed, but the rest remain. If the prisoner is really a person of ill fame, and ought to find sureties for his good behavior, the justices may proceed de novo, and take care that their proceedings are regular.

The prisoner is discharged.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.