Eddy v. Tops Friendly Markets
N.Y.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2024Scaltrito v. Mazzarisi N.Y. Sup. Ct., Richmond Cty.
- 2016Hernandez v. Conway Stores, Inc. N.Y. App. Div.
- 2009Luthringer v. Luthringer N.Y. App. Div.
- 2006Finger v. Cortese N.Y. App. Div.
- 2002Mineker v. White N.Y. App. Div.
- 2001Lekocevic v. Linder N.Y. App. Div.
- 2000Allstate Insurance v. Keil N.Y. App. Div.
- 2000Nearchou v. Broadway Mall Properties, Inc. N.Y. App. Div.
- 2000Autry v. Children's Hospital N.Y. App. Div.
- 1999Moorman v. Huntington Hospital N.Y. App. Div.
Cites 1 case
- Madrid v. City of New York
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Elmer Eddy et al., Appellants, v Tops Friendly Markets et al., Respondents.
Attorneys
- APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
- Peter A. Vinolus for appellant.
- Paul I. Perlman for respondent.
Memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 1203; see, also, Madrid v City of New York, 42 NY2d 1039; and 1 NY PJI2d 274-275).
We do not reach and have not considered appellant’s argument, raised for the first time before us, that notice is not an element of an action against a self-service supermarket with respect to a fall caused by material in the aisle (see Ann., 85 ALR3d 1000).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.