Doughty v. Maxwell

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 376 U.S. 202, 84 S. Ct. 702, 11 L. Ed. 2d 650, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1732

Decision Date: 2/24/1964

Docket Number: No. 422, Misc.

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Doughty v. Maxwell, 376 U.S. 202, 84 S. Ct. 702, 11 L. Ed. 2d 650, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1732 (1964)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1964


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 1% most-cited · cited by 86 decisions
86
Citing decisions
2
Authorities cited
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

48
33
2
2
1
1960s1970s1980s1990s2010s

Courts citing this case

2d Cir.5
3d Cir.4
U.S.4
W. Va.4
5th Cir.3
D.N.J.3
Most recently cited by10
  • 2016State v. Farfan-Galvan Idaho
  • 1999Manley v. State Nev.
  • 1993State v. Reimers Neb.
  • 1980Mastracchio v. Houle R.I.
  • 1980People v. Beckford N.Y. Sup. Ct.
  • 1978Prophet v. Duckworth 7th Cir.
  • 1976United States v. Jackson A.C.M.R.
  • 1976Engram v. State Okla. Crim. App.
  • 1976United States v. Lenardo D.N.J.
  • 1976Mayola v. State Ala. Crim. App.
Cites 2 cases

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

DOUGHTY v. MAXWELL, WARDEN.

Attorneys

  • Petitioner pro se.
  • William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and William C. Baird, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
majority Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U. S. 506, Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.