Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for Richmond
U.S.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Frequently CitedTop 18% most-cited · cited by 13 decisions
13
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
7
4
2
1970s1980s1990s
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 1994State of Rhode Island v. Lopes, 90-3789 (1994) Sup. Ct. R.I.
- 1993State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Radosevich Neb.
- 1981Postscript Enterprises, Inc. v. Whaley 8th Cir.
- 1981Neville v. State Md.
- 1980State v. Santos R.I.
- 1980Kelly v. State Md. Ct. Spec. App.
- 1978State v. Ciuffini N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
- 1977Saal v. Middendorf N.D. Cal.
- 1977State v. Saunders N.J.
- 1977State v. Kells Neb.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Doe et al. v. Commonwealth’s Attorney for the City of Richmond et al.
Judges
- Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Stevens would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
majority
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. Ya.
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Stevens would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.