Diggs v. Wolcott

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 4 Cranch 179, 8 U.S. 179, 2 L. Ed. 587, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 378, SCDB 1807-019

Decision Date: 1807-02

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Diggs v. Wolcott, 4 Cranch 179, 8 U.S. 179, 2 L. Ed. 587, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 378, SCDB 1807-019 (U.S. 1807)


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 2% most-cited · cited by 61 decisions
61
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

2
2
2
4
6
10
10
7
4
4
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1830s1840s1850s1860s1870s1880s1890s1900s1910s1920s1930s1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s2000s

Courts citing this case

U.S.10
5th Cir.3
Ala.3
4th Cir.2
9th Cir.2
C.C.S.D. Ohio2
Most recently cited by10
  • 2002Clay Regional Water v. City of Spirit Lake N.D. Iowa
  • 1982Sheetz v. Kares E.D. Pa.
  • 1981I.J.A. Inc. v. Marine Holdings Ltd. E.D. Pa.
  • 1971Duke v. Texas E.D. Tex.
  • 1964Donovan v. City of Dallas U.S.
  • 1959Manufacturers Record Publishing Co. v. Lauer E.D. La.
  • 1947Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Fredericksen D. Neb.
  • 1941Toucey v. New York Life Insurance U.S.
  • 1937Ritholz v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners in Optometry M.D.N.C.
  • 1932Ke-Sun Oil Co. v. Hamilton 9th Cir.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

Diggs & Keith v. Wolcott.

Attorneys

  • *The case was argued upon its merits by C. Lee and Swann, for the appellants, and by P. C. Key, for the appellee ;
majority but The Court

Being of opinion, that a circuit court of the United States had not jurisdiction to enjoin proceedings in a state court,

Reversed the decree.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.