Deboue v. Louisiana

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 498 U.S. 881

Decision Date: 10/1/1990

Docket Number: No. 89-7188; No. 89-7355; No. 89-7430; No. 89-7444; No. 89-7468; No. 89-7473; No. 89-7476; No. 89-7491; No. 89-7570; No. 89-7577; No. 89-7616; No. 89-7617; No. 89-7632; No. 89-7638; No. 89-7640; No. 89-7661; No. 89-7672; No. 89-7719; No. 89-7732; No. 89-7786; No. 89-7793; No. 89-7806; No. 89-7835; No. 89-7839; No. 89-7884; No. 90-5003; No. 90-5015; No. 90-5027; No. 90-5029; No. 90-5051; No. 90-5066; No. 90-5328; No. 90-5109; No. 90-5123; No. 90-5148; No. 90-5152; No. 90-5171; No. 90-5211; No. 90-5217; No. 90-5222; No. 90-5236; No. 90-5297; No. 90-5305; No. 90-5444; No. 90-5453

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Deboue v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 881 (1990)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1990


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Landmark AuthorityTop 1% most-cited · cited by 710 decisions
710
Citing decisions
40
Authorities cited
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

343
270
83
14
1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

Ohio Ct. App.238
Mo. Ct. App.86
Pa.38
Mo.33
Tex. App.33
Ala. Crim. App.28
Most recently cited by10
  • 2025Commonwealth v. Aaron Almeida, Jr. Mass.
  • 2024State v. Stanford Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2024State v. Brauchler Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2023State v. Backus Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2023State v. Fornbrook Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2022Com. v. Rodriguez, L. Pa. Super. Ct.
  • 2022State v. Graham Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2022State v. Logan Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2022Com. v. Parker, J. Pa. Super. Ct.
  • 2021Com. v. Cook, W. Pa. Super. Ct.
Cites 40 casesshowing 8

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

Deboue v. Louisiana. Eyler v. Illinois. Abu-Jamal v. Pennsylvania. Jones v. Missouri. Bradley v. Alabama. Resnover v. Indiana. Ryan v. Nebraska. Callahan v. Alabama. Davis v. Kemp, Warden. Lowery v. Indiana. Pitts v. Georgia. Brewer v. Ohio. Smith v. Virginia. Hall v. Georgia. Martin v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. Giarratano v. Procunier, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections. Lang v. California. Breakiron v. Pennsylvania. Scott v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. Finney v. Kemp, Warden. McMillin v. Missouri. O’Shea v. Pennsylvania. Collins v. Zant, Warden. Thompson v. California. Jackson v. California. Sattiewhite v. Texas. Gary v. Georgia. Amrine v. Missouri. Bell v. South Carolina. Moore v. Oklahoma. Fields v. Illinois. Hawkins v. Illinois. Franklin v. Illinois. Jamison v. Ohio. Green v. South Carolina. Clemmons v. Missouri. Powell v. Ohio. Savino v. Virginia. Hightower v. Georgia. Reed v. Florida. Weeks v. Alabama. Canaan v. Indiana. Jacobs v. Texas. Moreland v. Ohio. Schneider v. Missouri.

majority

Sup. Ct. La.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Sup. Ct. Pa.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

Sup. Ct. Ala.;

Sup. Ct. Ind.;

Sup. Ct. Neb.;

Sup. Ct. Ala.;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Ind.;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Ohio;

Sup. Ct. Va.;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

C. A. 11th Cir.;

C. A. 4th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Cal.;

Sup. Ct. Pa.;

C. A. 11th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

Sup. Ct. Pa.;

C. A. 11th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Cal.;

Sup. Ct. Cal.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

Sup. Ct. S. C.;

Ct. Crim. App. Okla.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Sup. Ct. Ohio;

Sup. Ct. S. C.;

No. 90-5152.

No. 90-5171.

No. 90-5211.

No. 90-5217.

No. 90-5222.

No. 90-5236.

No. 90-5297.

No. 90-5305.

No. 90-5444.

No. 90-5453.

Sup. Ct. Mo.;

Sup. Ct. Ohio;

Sup. Ct. Va.;

Sup. Ct. Ga.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.;'

Ct. Crim. App. Ala.;

Sup. Ct. Ind.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Sup. Ct. Ohio; and

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 89-7188, 552 So. 2d 355; No. 89-7355, 133 Ill. 2d 173, 549 N. E. 2d 268; No. 89-7430, 521 Pa. 188, 555 A. 2d 846; No. 89-7444, 784 S. W. 2d 789; No. 89-7473, 547 N. E. 2d 814; No. 89-7476, 233 Neb. 74, 444 N. W. 2d 610; No. 89-7491, 557 So. 2d 1311; No. 89-7577, 547 N. E. 2d 1046; No. 89-7616, 259 Ga. 745, 386 S. E. 2d 351; No. 89-7617, 48 Ohio St. 3d 50, 549 N. E. 2d 491; No. 89-7632, 239 Va. 243, 389 S. E. 2d 871; No. 89-7638, 259 Ga. 412, 383 S. E. 2d 128; No. 89-7640, 891 F. 2d 807; No. 89-7661, 891 F. 2d 483; No. 89-7672, 49 Cal. 3d 991, 782 P. 2d 627; No. 89-7719, 524 Pa. 282, 571 A. 2d 1035; No. 89-7732, 891 F. 2d 800; No. 89-7793, 783 S. W. 2d 82; No. 89-7806, 523 Pa. 384, 567 A. 2d 1023; No. 89-7835, 892 F. 2d 1502; No. 89-7839, 50 Cal. 3d 134, 785 P. 2d 857; No. 89-7884, 49 Cal. 3d 1170, 783 P. 2d 211; No. 90-5003, 786 S. W. 2d 271; No. 90-5015, 260 Ga. 38, 389 S. E. 2d 218; No. 90-5027, 785 S. W. 2d 531; No. 90-5029, 302 S. C. 18, 393 S. E. 2d 364; No. 90-5051, 788 P. 2d 387; Nos. 90-5066 and 90-5328, 135 Ill. 2d 18, 552 N. E. 2d 791; No. 90-5109, 135 Ill. 2d 78, 552 N. E. 2d 743; No. 90-5123, 49 Ohio St. 3d 182, 552 N. E. 2d 180; No. 90-5148, 301 S. C. 347, 392 S. E. 2d 157; No. 90-5152, 785 S. W. 2d 524; No. 90-5171, 49 Ohio St. 3d 255, 552 N. E. 2d 191; No. 90-5211, 239 Va. 534, 391 S. E. 2d 276; No. 90-5217, 259 Ga. 770, 386 S. E. 2d 509; No. 90-5222, 560 So. 2d 203; No. 90-5236, 568 So. 2d 864; No. 90-5297, 541 N. E. 2d 894; No. 90-5305, 787 S. W. 2d 397; No. 90-5444, 50 Ohio St. 3d 58, 552 N. E. 2d 894; No. 90-5453, 787 S. W. 2d 718.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.