DaSilva v. DaSilva
N.Y. App. Div.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Most recently cited by7
- 2025Hussaini v. Hussaini N.Y. App. Div.
- 2011Hoffman v. Hoffman N.Y. App. Div.
- 2008Vardaris Tech, Inc. v. Paleros Inc. N.Y. App. Div.
- 2006Iannone v. Iannone N.Y. App. Div.
- 2006Kwang Hee Lee v. Adjmi 936 Realty Associates N.Y. App. Div.
- 2003Lee v. 183 Port Richmond Avenue Realty, Inc. N.Y. App. Div.
- 2003Rose v. Rose N.Y. App. Div.
Cites 1 case
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Leon R. DaSilva, Respondent, v David DaSilva et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Leon R. DaSilva, Respondent, v David DaSilva et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.)
It is well settled that the appointment of a temporary receiver is an extreme remedy which can only be invoked in cases in which the moving party has made a clear evidentiary showing of the necessity for conservation of the property and protection of the interests of the movant (see, Serdaroglou v Serdaraglou, 209 AD2d 606; Modern Collection Assocs. v Capital Group, 140 AD2d 594). The plaintiffs showing, which consisted primarily of his attorney’s conclusory allegations, was rebutted by documentary proof and the sworn statement of the defendant Doreen DaSilva Costello in an affidavit that pending violations on the real property in question had been corrected.
The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.