Danek v. Hommer

N.J.

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Citations: 15 N.J. 573, 105 A.2d 677, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 300

Decision Date: 6/14/1954

Jurisdiction: NJ

Bluebook Citation: Danek v. Hommer, 15 N.J. 573, 105 A.2d 677, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 300 (N.J. 1954)

More Cases: N.J. decisions from 1954

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 2% most-cited · cited by 97 decisions

Citing decisions

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.61

N.J.12

D.N.J.7

N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div.3

9th Cir.2

N.J. Super. Ct. Ch. Div.2

Most recently cited by10

2025John William Myers v. Gny Mutual Insurance Company N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
2024Dionicio Rodriguez v. Shelbourne Spring, LLC N.J.
2023Dionicio Rodriguez v. Shelbourne Spring, LLC N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
2022Norman International, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (086155) (Morris County and Statewide) N.J.
2022COLIN YURCISIN v. RYAN FLEMING (L-0691-17 and L-2053-17, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
2021JOMAIN, LLC, ETC. VS. THE CITY OF HOBOKEN (L-3380-18, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
2021ANTHONY FOTI VS. JG ELIZABETH II, LLC D/B/A THE MILLS AT JERSEY GARDEN MALL (L-3213-17, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
2021OLVIN LEONEL RODRIGUEZ-ORTIZ VS. INTERSTATE RACKING & SHELVING, II, INC. (L-1477-15 AND L-1563-18, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
2020EDWARD HAMILTON VS. MORRIS SCHOOL DISTRICT VS. KCG, INC. (L-1446-16, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
2020COLD SPRING GRANITE COMPANY v. RLI INSURANCE COMPANY D.N.J.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

JOHN DANEK, PLAINTIFF, y. JULIUS J. HOMMER AND KATHERYN HOMMER, PARTNERS TRADING AS HOM-MER TOOL MFG. CO., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, y. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Attorneys

Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Shaw, Hughes & Pindar, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph Weintraub argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein, attorneys).

majority Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Francis in the court below.

Heher, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.

For reversal — None.