Danek v. Hommer

N.J.

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Citations: 15 N.J. 573, 105 A.2d 677, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 300

Decision Date: 6/14/1954

Jurisdiction: NJ

Bluebook Citation: Danek v. Hommer, 15 N.J. 573, 105 A.2d 677, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 300 (N.J. 1954)

More Cases: N.J. decisions from 1954

JOHN DANEK, PLAINTIFF, y. JULIUS J. HOMMER AND KATHERYN HOMMER, PARTNERS TRADING AS HOM-MER TOOL MFG. CO., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, y. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Attorneys

Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Shaw, Hughes & Pindar, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph Weintraub argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein, attorneys).

majority Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Francis in the court below.

Heher, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.

For reversal — None.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.