Conn v. City of Reno
9th Cir.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2026United States v. Cooley 9th Cir.
- 2026Moore v. Dunlap 9th Cir.
- 2026Estate of Joseph Posard v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department 9th Cir.
- 2025(PC) Dresdner v. Sacramento County Jail E.D. Cal.
- 2025(PC) Vasquez v. Market Square E.D. Cal.
- 2025Gathrite v. Dominguez N.D. Cal.
- 2025Barajas E.D. Cal.
- 2025Cheryl D. Dresdner, et al. v. Sacramento County Jail, et al. E.D. Cal.
- 2025Snook v. Johnson D. Nev.
- 2025Green v. Kootenai County Sheriff's Office D. Idaho
Cites 1 case
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Charla CONN and Dustin Conn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RENO; Ryan Ashton; David Robertson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges
- Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys
- Terri Keyser-Cooper, Law Office of Terry Keyser-Cooper, Reno, NV, Diane K. Vaillancourt, Esquire, Santa Cruz, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
- Jack D. Campbell, Counsel, Office Of The City Attorney, Donald L. Christensen, Counsel, Reno City Attorney’s Office, Patricia A. Lynch, Esquire, Reno, NV, for Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER
We reinstate the opinion at 591 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.2010), except that in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Connick v. Thompson, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1350, 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011), we affirm in all respects the district court’s grant of summary judgment as to municipality liability. Parts 111(C)(1) and 111(C)(2) of the opinion will remain vacated. Therefore, we order that the district court’s decision is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.