Chattin v. Cape May Greene, Inc.

N.J.

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Citations: 124 N.J. 520, 591 A.2d 943, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 66

Decision Date: 7/1/1991

Jurisdiction: NJ

Bluebook Citation: Chattin v. Cape May Greene, Inc., 124 N.J. 520, 591 A.2d 943, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 66 (N.J. 1991)

More Cases: N.J. decisions from 1991


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 3% most-cited · cited by 76 decisions
76
Citing decisions
1
Authorities cited
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

26
26
13
11
1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.45
D.N.J.10
N.J.7
N.J. Super. Ct.3
3d Cir.2
Bankr. D.N.J.2
Most recently cited by10
  • 2026Darlene Epps v. Dgmb Casino, LLC N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 2025Jason Wright v. Fenix Towing LLC N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 2025Agim Mucaj v. Gregory J. Coughlin N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 2024LENCHITZ v. CENLAR FSB D.N.J.
  • 2023WILKINS v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION D.N.J.
  • 2022Weis Markets, Inc v. The SF Group M.D. Penn.
  • 2020COMET MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC VS. NICOLE WOOTEN (L-0740-14, SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 2020MARSHALL v. VERDE ENERGY USA, INC. D.N.J.
  • 2020CDK GLOBAL, LLC v. TULLEY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. D.N.J.
  • 2020THE ESTATE OF LESTER COTTON v. SENIOR PLANNING SERVICES, LLC D.N.J.
Cites 1 case

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

WAYNE E. CHATTIN; FRANK J. INGARGIOLA AND BARBARA J. INGARGIOLA, HIS WIFE; JOSEPH J. MARTELLA AND BARBARA J. MARTELLA, HIS WIFE; ANTHONY BUCCAFERNI AND PATRICK SMITH, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ON BEHALF OF A CLASS OF HOMEOWNERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, v. CAPE MAY GREENE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, AND CAPITOL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Attorneys

  • Thomas J. Vesper argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents (McAllister, Westmoreland, Vesper & Schwartz, attorneys, Thomas J. Vesper and Dara A. Quattrone, on the briefs).
  • Frederick J. Dennehy argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys, Frederick J. Dennehy, Lisa A. Rosenmertz, and Lisa Adubato Nesi, on the briefs).
majority PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman’s majority opinion, reported at 243 N.J.Super. 590, 581 A.2d 91.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.