Chase v. Peay
4th Cir.
4th Cir.
Warren CHASE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Phlonda PEAY; Jack Kavanagh, Warden; David McKoy, (C.O.#2); Eric Thompson; Ronald Tolbert; Eness Brown, Lieutenant; Vanessa Willis, Sgt. Ms.; Keith Harris, Correctional Officer # 2 Mr.; Bernard Jones, Lieutenant Mr.; Frank Delbridge, Correctional Officer #2, Mr.; Benson Bell, Correctional Officer # 1, Mr.; Samuel Lee, Major; Nicole Knox, Correctional Officer # 2, Ms.; Denise White, Sergeant; David Roane, Correctional Officer # 2, Mr.; Eric Nelson, Sergeant; Charles Graham, Captain; Thomas Carter, Sergeant Mr.; Rodney Byrd, Correctional Officer # 2, Mr.; Daryl Robinson, Correctional Officer # 2, Mr.; Ernest Potee, Correctional Officer # 2, Mr.; Amahl Foster, Correctional Officer # 1, Mr.; Deborah Shifflett, Correctional Officer # 2, Ms.; George Braxton, Correctional Officer # 1, Mr.; Vincent Moore, Correctional Officer # 2, Mr.; Jehu Ragins, Mr., (C.O.# 2), Defendants—Appellees.
Warren Chase appeals a district court order granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court opinion and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Chase v. Peay, 286 F.Supp.2d 523 (D.Md.2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.