Cartwright v. Cupp

9th Cir.

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Citations: 650 F.2d 1103, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11523

Decision Date: 7/13/1981

Docket Number: No. 80-3502

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Cartwright v. Cupp, 650 F.2d 1103, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11523 (9th Cir. 1981)

More Cases: 9th Cir. decisions from 1981


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 4% most-cited · cited by 73 decisions
73
Citing decisions
3
Authorities cited
1
statute cited
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

8
10
3
9
43
1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

C.D. Cal.27
9th Cir.18
E.D. Cal.16
S.D. Cal.4
D. Ariz.3
N.D. Cal.3
Most recently cited by10
  • 2025Townsend v. Speer W.D. Wash.
  • 2025Roderick Washington v. Richard Brumfield C.D. Cal.
  • 2025Rodolfo Fernandez Franco v. F. Guzman C.D. Cal.
  • 2025Warden E.D. Cal.
  • 2025Daniel M. Diaz v. Warden-CSP Calipatria C.D. Cal.
  • 2025(HC) Mosier v. Honea E.D. Cal.
  • 2025(HC) Chong v. Amador County Jail E.D. Cal.
  • 2025Jasman Dawone Holman v. The People of State of California C.D. Cal.
  • 2024Michael Robinson v. St. Andre C.D. Cal.
  • 2024Alfred Eric Caraffa v. Ryan Thornell C.D. Cal.
Cites 1 statute
Cites 2 cases

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

Dennis Lee CARTWRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hoyt C. CUPP, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Defendant-Appellee.

Attorneys

  • Dennis Lee Cartwright, pro se.
  • Rudolph S. Westerband, Asst. U. S. Atty., Salem, Or., for defendant-appellee.
majority PER CURIAM.

Dennis Lee Cartwright pled guilty to murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment. After being denied an early parole, he commenced state post-conviction proceedings alleging constitutional defects in his guilty plea.

After taking his state court remedies to the intermediate appellate level without success, he brought federal habeas corpus proceedings and now appeals a summary judgment in favor of the state. While Cartwright alleges that he has exhausted his state court remedies, there is nothing in the record to show that he sought review in the Oregon Supreme Court. He recites only that he appealed to the Oregon Court of Appeals. The district court should have dismissed the petition for failure to exhaust. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). See Carothers v. Rhay, 594 F.2d 225, 228 (9th Cir. 1979); Williams v. Nelson, 431 F.2d 932 (9th Cir. 1970).

Affirmed.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.