Brown v. Johnson
Ga.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2026Lamarr Anthony Evans v. Jeff Simpson, Judge, Superior Court of Carroll County Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Christopher Houston v. Eric Dunaway, Judge Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Joshua Keith Kirkley v. Superior Court of Effingham County, Georgia Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Ayesha Howard v. Alice Benton, Judge Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Rebecca Alcantara v. Kenneth Smith, Judge Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Sean P. Ross v. Arch McGarity, Senior Judge Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Tyrus Alphonse Williams v. Danielle Forte, Clerk Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026WILLIE CHAMBERS v. MARILYN BENNETT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026William Paul Bradley Jr v. F. Gates Peed, Senior Judge, Bulloch County Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Kareem Marshall v. Sarah F. Wall, Judge Ga. Ct. App.
Cites 1 case
- Shreve v. Pendleton
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
BROWN v. JOHNSON.
Judges
- All the Justices concur.
Attorneys
- Phillip Brown, pro se.
- Willis B. Sparks, District Attorney, for appellee.
Prior to the effective date of the Constitution of 1983, this court had no original jurisdiction. See Const. 1976, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV (Code Ann. § 2-3104).
The Constitution of 1983, effective July 1, 1983, provides that “Each court may exercise such powers as necessary in aid of its jurisdiction or to protect or effectuate its judgments; but only the superior and appellate courts shall have the power to issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, specific performance, quo warranto, and injunction.” (Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. IV (Code Ann. § 2-2704).)
In the matter before us, petitioner has filed a petition for mandamus seeking to invoke the original jurisdiction of this court to require the respondent, a superior court judge, to enter an order in a matter allegedly pending more than thirty days in violation of OCGA § 15-6-21 (a) (Code Ann. § 24-2620). Without considering the merits of this petition, we find it appropriate to specify, at least as is applicable to the case at hand, the procedure to be followed before seeking to invoke this court’s original jurisdiction.
Generally, the superior courts of this state have the power, in proper cases, to issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, specific performance, quo warranto, and injunction, and hence the need to resort to the appellate courts for such relief by petition filed in the appellate courts will be extremely rare.
There may occasionally appear to be a need to file an original petition in the Supreme Court to issue process in the nature of mandamus, and perhaps quo warranto or prohibition, where a superior court judge is named as the respondent. This appearance is misleading. Such petition may be filed in the appropriate superior court. Being the respondent, the superior court judge will disqualify, another superior court judge will be appointed to hear and determine the matter, and the final decision may be appealed to the Supreme Court for review. Anything to the contrary in Shreve v. Pendleton, 129 Ga. 374 (58 SE 880) (1907), will no longer be followed.
Decided September 8, 1983.
Phillip Brown, pro se.
Willis B. Sparks, District Attorney, for appellee.
The petition for writ of mandamus filed in this court is therefore dismissed.
Petition for Writ Dismissed.
All the Justices concur.