CiteLaw

Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 390 U.S. 923, 88 S. Ct. 856

Decision Date: 1/29/1968

Docket Number: No. 859; No. 861; No. 862; No. 863; No. 933

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad, 390 U.S. 923, 88 S. Ct. 856 (1968)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1968

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 4% most-cited · cited by 47 decisions
47
Citing decisions
1
Authorities cited
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

11
24
10
2
1960s1970s1980s1990s

Courts citing this case

D.C. Cir.16
7th Cir.7
D.D.C.5
2d Cir.3
5th Cir.3
9th Cir.2
Most recently cited by10
  • 1995Alton & Southern Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes D.D.C.
  • 1995Alton & Southern Railway v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees D.C. Cir.
  • 1989Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers (In re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.) Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
  • 1988International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Eastern Airlines, Inc. D.C. Cir.
  • 1987National Railway Labor Conference v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers 7th Cir.
  • 1987Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Boston & Maine Corp. D. Me.
  • 1987International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. D. Minn.
  • 1986Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Intenational v. United Air Lines, Inc. 7th Cir.
  • 1983United Parcel Service (New York), Inc. v. Local 804, International Brotherhood of Teamsters 2d Cir.
  • 1980Trans International Airlines, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters 9th Cir.
Cites 1 case

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. et al.; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Co. et al.; Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen v. Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Co. et al.; Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al.; and Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen.

Judges

  • Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Attorneys

  • Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, Harriett R. Taylor, Isaac N. Groner, Harold C. Heiss, Donald W. Bennett, Alex Elson, Willard J. Lassers and Aaron S. Wolff for petitioner, and Francis M. Shea, Richard T. Conway and James R. Wolfe for respondents in No. 859.
  • Milton Kramer, Lester P. Schoene and Martin W. Fingerhut for petitioners, and Messrs. Shea, Conway and Wolfe for respondents in No. 861.
  • James D. Hill and Harry E. Wilmarth for petitioner, and Messrs. Shea, Conway and Wolfe for respondents in No. 862.
  • Messrs. Shea, Conway and Wolfe for petitioners, and Messrs. Kramer, Schoene and Fingerhut for Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al., and Messrs. Hill and Wil-marth for Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen, respondents, in No. 863.
  • Messrs. Shea, Conway and Wolfe for petitioners, and Messrs. Rauh, Silard, Groner, Heiss, Bennett, Elson, Lassers and Wolff, David Epstein, and Mrs. Taylor for respondent in No. 933.
majority

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 128 U. S. App. D. C. 59, 385 F. 2d 581.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.

Sign up free Open in CiteLaw