Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

5th Cir.

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Citations: 700 F.2d 214, 8 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 143, 10 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 419, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30112

Decision Date: 2/28/1983

Docket Number: No. 83-1048

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 700 F.2d 214, 8 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 143, 10 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 419, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30112 (5th Cir. 1983)

More Cases: 5th Cir. decisions from 1983

In the Matter of BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., et al., Debtor. BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Defendant, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant.

Attorneys

Ronald S. Orr, David H. Kennedy, Los Angeles, Cal., Stephen L. Taylor, Dallas Fort Worth Airport, Tex., for intervenorappellant.
Kent Kibbie, Fort Worth, Tex., for Bank of New York, etc.
David Bonderman, Washington, D.C., Daniel C. Stewart, Dallas, Tex., for Braniff.
Robert J. White, Los Angeles, Cal., for Pacific Southwest Airlines.
John R. Blinn, Stephen A. Goodwin, Fort Worth, Tex., for amicus curiae Secured Bank Lenders to Braniff Airways.
Eloise E. Davies, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae U.S.

majority PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment of the District Court, essentially for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion. We add, in particular, that we conclude that 28 United States Code §§ 1471(a) and (b) were not invalidated by the Marathon decision, but if they were, nevertheless, the jurisdictional grant of 28 United States Code § 1334 remains effective during the transitional period.

AFFIRMED.

. The Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipeline Co.,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 2858, 73 L.Ed.2d 598 (1982).

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.