Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
5th Cir.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 1987Gibbons v. Haddad (In re Haddad) Bankr. D. Mass.
- 1987Earl Industries, Inc. v. Bond General Contracting, Inc. (In re Earle Industries, Inc.) Bankr. E.D. Pa.
- 1986Associated Grocers of Nebraska Cooperative, Inc. v. American Home Products Corp. (In re Associated Grocers of Nebraska Cooperative, Inc.) D. Neb.
- 1986DuVoisin v. Anderson (In re Southern Industrial Banking Corp.) Bankr. E.D. Tenn.
- 1986M & E Contractors, Inc. v. Kugler-Morris General Contractors, Inc. N.D. Tex.
- 1986Addison v. O'Leary E.D. Va.
- 1986Texas Extrusion Corp. v. Palmer, Palmer & Coffee (In re Texas Extrusion Corp.) N.D. Tex.
- 1986Sandoz v. Merchants Trust & Savings Bank 5th Cir.
- 1986Nicola v. BarclaysAmerican/Business Credit, Inc. (In re Inland Manufacturing Co.) D. Neb.
- 1986Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'n Tex. App.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
In the Matter of BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., et al., Debtor. BRANIFF AIRWAYS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Defendant, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant.
Attorneys
- Ronald S. Orr, David H. Kennedy, Los Angeles, Cal., Stephen L. Taylor, Dallas Fort Worth Airport, Tex., for intervenorappellant.
- Kent Kibbie, Fort Worth, Tex., for Bank of New York, etc.
- David Bonderman, Washington, D.C., Daniel C. Stewart, Dallas, Tex., for Braniff.
- Robert J. White, Los Angeles, Cal., for Pacific Southwest Airlines.
- John R. Blinn, Stephen A. Goodwin, Fort Worth, Tex., for amicus curiae Secured Bank Lenders to Braniff Airways.
- Eloise E. Davies, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae U.S.
We affirm the judgment of the District Court, essentially for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion. We add, in particular, that we conclude that 28 United States Code §§ 1471(a) and (b) were not invalidated by the Marathon decision, but if they were, nevertheless, the jurisdictional grant of 28 United States Code § 1334 remains effective during the transitional period.
AFFIRMED.
. The Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipeline Co.,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 2858, 73 L.Ed.2d 598 (1982).