Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 467 U.S. 1267, 82 L. Ed. 2d 863, 104 S. Ct. 3561, 52 U.S.L.W. 3920, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 320

Decision Date: 6/25/1984

Docket Number: No. 82-1246; No. 82-1554; No. 82-2056; No. 83-1521

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 467 U.S. 1267, 82 L. Ed. 2d 863, 104 S. Ct. 3561, 52 U.S.L.W. 3920, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 320 (1984)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1984

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Landmark AuthorityTop 1% most-cited · cited by 601 decisions

601

Citing decisions

Authorities cited

Courts citing

Citations by decade

142

222

135

1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

Conn. Super. Ct.66

Kan. Ct. App.60

Kan.34

Ind.32

Wyo.27

N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.24

Most recently cited by10

2024Tilghman v. State Kan. Ct. App.
2024Verser v. State Kan. Ct. App.
2024Andrews v. State Kan. Ct. App.
2024Alfaro-Valleda v. State Kan. Ct. App.
2023Hollenbeck v. State Kan. Ct. App.
2023Brown v. State Kan. Ct. App.
2023Ojeda v. State Kan. Ct. App.
2022Macomber v. State Kan. Ct. App.
2022Williams v. State Kan. Ct. App.
2022Seacat v. State Kan. Ct. App.

Cites 3 cases

Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union
Strickland v. Washington
Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., Strickland, Superintendent, Florida State Prison, et al. v. Washington, Escondido Mutual Water Co. et al. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians et al., Weiss v. Employer-Sheet Metal Workers Local 544 Pension Trust Plan et al.,

majority

466 U. S. 485;

466 U. S. 668;

466 U. S. 765; and

466 U. S. 972. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.

Citation analytics

Citations by decade

Courts citing this case

Opinion

Chat with this case using AI