Bonahan v. Nebraska

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 125 U.S. 692, 31 L. Ed. 854, 8 S. Ct. 1390, SCDB 1887-002, 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2218

Decision Date: 10/17/1887

Docket Number: No. 501

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Bonahan v. Nebraska, 125 U.S. 692, 31 L. Ed. 854, 8 S. Ct. 1390, SCDB 1887-002, 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2218 (1887)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1887


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 1% most-cited · cited by 84 decisions
84
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

2
2
1
1
3
4
3
18
10
22
12
6
1890s1900s1910s1920s1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s

Courts citing this case

U.S.8
5th Cir.6
10th Cir.4
2d Cir.4
S.C.4
7th Cir.3
Most recently cited by10
  • 2018State of Tennessee v. Marcus Williams Tenn. Crim. App.
  • 2013Niemi v. Lasshofer 10th Cir.
  • 2013Niemi v. Burgess 10th Cir.
  • 2010Reid v. Commonwealth Va. Ct. App.
  • 2010Cedeno v. Conway W.D.N.Y.
  • 2009United States v. Kashamu N.D. Ill.
  • 2008United States v. Zedner 2d Cir.
  • 2007Wechsler v. Wechsler N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2007State v. Raiburn Kan. Ct. App.
  • 2005United States v. Erdil E.D.N.Y.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

BONAHAN v. NEBRASKA.

Attorneys

  • Mr. Cha/rles O. Wheedon and Mr. C. E. Magoon for plaintiff in error.
  • Mr. WiUiam Leese for defendant in error.
majority Mr. Chief Justice Waite

Delivered the opinion of the court.

It appearing that during the pendency of this writ the plaintiff in error has escaped, and is not now within the control of the court below, either actually, by being in custody, or constructively, by being out on bail, it is ordered that the submission of the cause be set aside and that unless the -plaintiff in error is brought or comes within the jurisdiction and under the control of the court below on or before the last day of, this term the cause be thereafter left off the docket until directions to the contrary. Smith v. United States, 94 Ü. S_ 97.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.