Black v. State
Tex. App.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Most recently cited by10
- 2010Clifford Ward Futch v. State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2010Adrian Eugene Greenwood v. State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2010Alvin Leon Gaines v. State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2010Keith Lynn Wood, II v. State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2010William Edward Ditmore, Jr. v. State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2010Eddie Palma Jr. v. State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2010Kevin Davis Merrifield v. State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2010Michael Lee Munoz v. State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2010Leonard Ray Robertson v. State of Texas Tex. App.
- 2010Lee Hardy Pervis Jr. v. State of Texas Tex. App.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Rusty Allen BLACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges
- Panel consists of WRIGHT, C. J., McCALL, J., and STRANGE, J.
Attorneys
- Lisa Pence, Stephenville, for appellant.
- John Terrill, District Attorney, Stephen-ville, for appellee.
Rusty Allen Black entered a plea of guilty to injury to a child. The jury convicted him of the offense and assessed his punishment at confinement for ten years. We affirm.
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and states that she has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of his right to review the record and file a response to counsel’s brief. A response has not been filed. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App.1969); Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2005, no pet.).
Following the procedures outlined in Anders, we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit. We note that counsel has the responsibility to advise appellant that he may file a petition for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670 (Tex.Crim.App.2006). Likewise, this court advises appellant that he may file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to Tex.R.App. P. 66.
The motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.