Bishop v. United States
U.S.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Landmark AuthorityTop 1% most-cited · cited by 219 decisions
219
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
6
51
76
33
19
9
14
11
1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2026State v. Pritchard Ohio Ct. App.
- 2025Covello E.D. Cal.
- 2025State v. Hall Ohio Ct. App.
- 2023King v. Warden, Lake Erie Correctional Institution S.D. Ohio
- 2023Swartz v. Warden, London Correctional Institution S.D. Ohio
- 2023Forrest Thomas, III a/k/a Forrest Thomas v. State of Mississippi Miss. Ct. App.
- 2023Singleton v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institute S.D. Ohio
- 2022United States v. Eric Thomas 6th Cir.
- 2021STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SYLVESTER H. CHEW (12-06-1598, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
- 2021State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle La. Ct. App.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Bishop v. United States.
Attorneys
- Edward John Skeens for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff for the United States.
majority
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for a hearing on the sanity of the petitioner at the time of his trial.