Bailey v. Richardson

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 341 U.S. 918, 95 L. Ed. 2d 1352, 71 S. Ct. 669, SCDB 1950-114, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1926

Decision Date: 4/30/1951

Docket Number: No. 49

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Bailey v. Richardson, 341 U.S. 918, 95 L. Ed. 2d 1352, 71 S. Ct. 669, SCDB 1950-114, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1926 (1951)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1951

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Frequently CitedTop 19% most-cited · cited by 12 decisions

Citing decisions

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1950s1960s1970s1980s

Courts citing this case

Ct. Cl.2

Mich.2

6th Cir.1

9th Cir.1

D.R.I.1

Ill. App. Ct.1

Most recently cited by10

1981Falk v. State Bar Mich.
1978Fox v. Civil Service Commission Ill. App. Ct.
1976Elrod v. Burns U.S.
1976Riger v. L & B Ltd. Partnership Md.
1973Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Little v. Rhay Wash. Ct. App.
1972Langford v. City of Texarkana W.D. Ark.
1971Orr v. Trinter 6th Cir.
1965Boland v. United States Ct. Cl.
1960Deglau v. Franke D.R.I.
1955Denning v. United States Ct. Cl.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

Bailey v. Richardson et al.

Judges

Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Attorneys

Thurman Arnold and Paul A. Porter argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were Abe Fortas and Milton V. Freeman. Solicitor General Perlman argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Morison, James L. Morrisson and Samuel D. Slade.

majority

Certiorari, 339 U. S. 977, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Per Curiam: The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.