Arcambel v. Wiseman
U.S.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Highly CitedTop 1% most-cited · cited by 98 decisions
98
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
1
1
1
2
4
1
3
4
4
16
10
13
21
17
1860s1870s1880s1890s1900s1910s1920s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2025SPENCER SAVINGS BANK, S.L.A. v. VASTA D.N.J.
- 2024In re Delaware Public Schools Litigation Del.
- 2024Hagemann v. Durkin Bankr. D.N.M.
- 2023In re Wawa, Inc. Data Security Litigation v. 3rd Cir.
- 2023Elevation Ents., Ltd. v. NMRD, Ltd. Ohio Ct. App.
- 2022Wendell H. Stone Company, Inc. v. Five Star Advertising, LLC D. Colo.
- 2022Cruz v. English Nanny & Governess School Ohio
- 2022Dalton M, LLC v. North Cascade Trustee Services, Inc. Wash. Ct. App.
- 2022Agma Security Service, Inc. v. United States Fed. Cl.
- 2022Wesco Ins. Co. v. Roderick Linton Belfance, LLP 6th Cir.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Arcambel versus Wiseman.
majority
:—We do not think that this charge ought to be allowed. The general pra£lice of the United States is in opofttion to it; and even if that pratftice. were not ftridtly correct in principle, it is entitled to the refpeét of the court, till it is changed, or modified, by ftatute. ; ■
There are feveral ways in which the- charge may be expunged: l?ut we recommend, as, perhaps, the eafieft way; that the counfel for the Defendant in error, ihould enter a remitti . tur for the amount. .
A remittitur was accordingly entered.