Animal Defense Council v. Hodel
9th Cir.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2025Howell v. Garland D. Mont.
- 2025American Petroleum Institute v. U.S. Department of Commerce E.D. La.
- 2022Friends of the Clearwater v. Probert D. Idaho
- 2021Unite the Parks v. U.S. Forest Service E.D. Cal.
- 2021Yellowstone to Uintas Connection v. Bolling D. Idaho
- 2021Yaak Valley Forest Council v. Vilsack D. Mont.
- 2020Earth Island Institute v. Nash E.D. Cal.
- 2020Sawtooth Mountain Ranch LLC v. United States Forest Service D. Idaho
- 2020Backes v. Bernhardt D. Or.
- 2019Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service E.D. Cal.
Cites 1 case
- Animal Defense Council v. Hodel
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
ANIMAL DEFENSE COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Donald P. HODEL, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees.
Judges
- Before HUG, NELSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
We regret that in the opinion, published at 840 F.2d 1432, there was an error made on page 1436, in the second column in the first full paragraph. This paragraph should read as follows:
The district court may also inquire outside of the administrative record “when it appears the agency has relied on documents or materials not included in the record.” Public Power Council [v. Johnson], 674 F.2d [791] at 794 [9th Cir.1982], In addition, discovery may be permitted if supplementation of the record is necessary to explain technical terms or complex subject matter involved in the agency action. Id.