61 Jane Street Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 65 N.Y. 898, 65 N.Y.2d 898, 493 N.Y.S.2d 455, 483 N.E.2d 130, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15175

Decision Date: 7/11/1985

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: 61 Jane Street Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board, 65 N.Y. 898, 65 N.Y.2d 898, 493 N.Y.S.2d 455, 483 N.E.2d 130, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15175 (1985)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1985

In the Matter of 61 Jane Street Associates, Appellant, v New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board et al., Respondents.

Attorneys

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Richard F. Czaja for appellant.
Cullen S. McVoy for respondents.

majority

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said that the determination of lawful rent was either arbitrary or capricious, or that the remedy imposed was disproportionate under the circumstances.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.